FANDOM

Zensalin

aka Zensa / Zensalin1

Bureaucrat Admin
  • I live in the tavern of the next city.
  • My occupation is a wannabe professional mercenary.
  • I am a Male.
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hi!

    Can you please tell me how or whether I can add "Contents" on a page Beasts ? If only administrators can do that, can you please add it there?

    It exists on every "Enemies" page, but not there. Its absence also doesn't allow to make links directly to specific beasts (like, f.e. on Orc Young page).

      Loading editor
    • Hi!

      This box that has "Contents" written in it, automatically appears when there are more than 3 Headers on a page.(I think it was 3, if I remember that correctly.)
      A Header is for example ===Orc Young=== written somewhere on a page, or ==Orcs==. These are basically titles for orientation on a page.

      The number of = defines the "level" of a header.

      The Header ==Orcs== will be above the header ===Orc Warrior===.

      The result of this is for example what you see on the Orcs page.
      There is the header orcs as point 4 in the box and the points Orc Young, Orc Warrior, etc. as 4.1, 4.2, etc.

      If two headers have the same "level", they will count numbers. For example: ==Military Structure== is a "level" 2 header, because of the 2 = symbols.
      ==Military Tactics== is also a "level" 2 header.

      Because of that, they count numbers. Military Structure is point 2, and Military Tactics is point 3.

      If you would put a ===Orc Buildings=== somewhere between </nowiki>==Military Structure==</nowiki> and ==Military Tactics==, then we would have:
      2. Military Structure
      2.1 Orc Buildings
      3. Military Tactics


      I created such Headers on the Beasts page. You can now link to Beasts#Lindwurm.

      (You can also force a "Contents" box to appear, even if there are less than 3 headers, if you write __TOC__ somewhere on the page or you can force it to never appear on a page if you write __NOTOC__.)

        Loading editor
    • Thank you very much!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello!

    Can you, please, delete "Blunt Weapon " section from "Melee" page as it is no longer needed?

    That's why: In earlier versions there was a separation between blunt weapons and maces, but now they are all "Maces". So I copied all of them in "Maces".

      Loading editor
    • Hi!

      Thanks for letting me know, I removed the Blunt Weapons from the Melee Weapons page.

      The page Blunt Weapons itself was not deleted, but redirected. (I didn't want to risk breaking old links.)

      So if anyone ever clicks on an old link of Blunt Weapons somewhere on the internet, he will automatically be redirected to the Maces page.

        Loading editor
    • Thank you! Perfect.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Took a screenshot of the "besieged" settlement status, since it wasn't on the wiki. Unable to upload it though. Can I send it to you?

      Loading editor
    • Did you take the screenshot via steam? If you can't upload the screenshot on the wiki, but you can publish/upload it on steam, then please do that.
      (Click on the game in the steam library, scroll down until you see your screenshots. Click "Show Screenshot Collection". Now choose the screenshot and click upload/publish. Choose "Public" as option for who is allowed to see it.
      Afterwards click "Show online" on the next page click "Share" and copy and post the link please.)

      If that also doesn't work, then report back and we will find another way.

        Loading editor
    • Was able to upload it to the image bank of the wikia, but not directly while editing! It worked in the end. You can see it in the Settlement status page!

        Loading editor
    • Perfect, thank you!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Working on the conctracts page. What do you think of the changes?

      Loading editor
    • Looks great, thank you!

      Can you explain what exactly you mean to say with the images in the "Availability" column?
      Does a peasant mean, that it's available in villages and the soldier that it's available in noble house settlements? If so, what does the Orc image mean then?

      I think I don't completely understand this, but I like the idea. :D

        Loading editor
    • I might change those! For now:

      Paesant means that these quests are available in villages.

      Guy with noble hat means this quest is given by the noble houses.

      Orc means it's available during greenskin invasion, skeleton during undead scourge, and knight during noble house wars.

        Loading editor
    • Ah, now I understand.

      Feel free to continue as you like. :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi. I've noticed that there is no "Goblin Poison" and "Strange Mushrooms
    Mushimage
    Mush
    Mushuse
    " in 'accessories' category. Couldn't add it there. So here is everything about it.
    Goblinpoisonusage
    Goblinpoison
    Goblinpoisonimage
      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • Thank you for this detailed explanation. Glad to have learned something before going to bed :)

        Loading editor
    • Once again thank you two for the info and for creating new useful pages.

      I also agree that adding net and flask to ranged weapons is a good idea as they are both throwing weapons.

      UPD. Created net (after Zensalins explanation) and also added it and flask to throwing weapon category.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi. I just created a new page for those who (like me) whant to write a thank message to the dev team.

    I don't know if that is the place but i figured i's take initiatives anyways

    If it is ok would you add a link on the main page ?

    Thx

    Regards


    Felix

      Loading editor
    • Greets!

      Ah, a nice gesture. I like the idea. :)

      About the execution of your idea, I can think of two ways:

      1) The way you do it. Everyone who does want to can add an entry to the page and separates his comment from the previous comment.
      Your/This way has the great advantage that everyone (regardless if registered on wikia or not) can write something.
      Problem is that the page would maybe get really long and when adding something new someone has to scroll down and maybe accidentally edits/deletes the comment of someone else. (That's not really a problem though, even with my little experience I can recover such an error quite easily.)
      (Of course, there are also ways to code/program something that allows to add a comment without actually editing the page on your own, but I lack the skills to create something like that...)

      2) Everyone creates a blog post with what he wants to say and gives it the category "Love Letter" or something like that. I then create a page that automatically collects all these blog posts and lists them one after another.
      Positive: Everyone only has to care about his own comment and it will be sorted automatically.
      Problem: Only registered users can write blog posts.


      What do you think is the better way?
      Anyway, I will add a link on the mainpage.

        Loading editor
    • Seems like the first solution would allow a more spontaneous collection of letters. If you don't mind the occasionnal repairs it might require.

      Thx for making this wiki what it is. It is a great help to enjoy BB in a more complete fashion

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey Zensalin !

    I managed to beat the Black Monolih without retreating or losing a single guy on the 259th day.

    After three succesful companies (with over 300 days each) I believe I can write a company guide for those still struggling updated to reflect April's perks and whatnot.

    Can I write one or does the wiki have enough of that content already?


    Thanks,

    Rick.

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Hey there Zen! And thanks a lot for the compliment. ^^

      Hopefully, 20 years from now they'll get to that conclusion. For now all they care is having parties and getting wasted lmao.

      Anyway... I was browsing the wiki and stumbled across this page here:

      http://battlebrothers.wikia.com/wiki/Character_Builds#Bow_Archer_Build

      I highly, strongly, with all my brain cells disagree with what they say about archers over there. I don't want, however, to trample on other ppl work and/or ideas. How can I edit/create/show other people that there is an alternative, if not a outright better way to build their archers?


      Thanks is advance, man.

      Rick.

        Loading editor
    • Hi,

      well, there are some ways.  As the one who added these builds is not a registered user, the chances of him coming back and reading a comment where you explain why he is wrong are quite low, I think.

      But still, the best thing to do would be that, I think: Create your own archer entry and explain in the comments why this and that from the other build is wrong. Even if the original creator will not read this comment, other visitors will do.

      Variety is the key and the more builds there are, the more possibilities the people have to choose from, after thinking what they themselves think to be right. And maybe you convince them to not build their archers like that with the explanation you give in the comments.


      Anyway, do whatever you think is best.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey Zen

    Can you put guides and mod and player created content into separate category?

    Like before it was ?

      Loading editor
  • There is a event when a battle brother has the dumb trait removed by a historian or monk. I was wondering if this is reoccurring or only happens once. My favorite warrior has the dumb trait and failed in becoming smarter so I wanted to know if he would get another shot at it. Let me know if this happened to you.

      Loading editor
    • Hi!

      I read that monks and historians can remove the dumb trait from multiple brothers throughout a playthrough. I also know that when the event fails, the teacher get's disgruntled.

      A situation like yours has not happened to me personally so far, but from what I think, read and have seen in the game so far, I think that it is possible that the event will reoccur (maybe through a historian, but maybe also through the same monk), but as with all events in the game, this will take its time.

        Loading editor
    • I thought so, thanks though. I am glad my dumb orc slayer still has a chance to get smarter.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I see in english wiki not created page for scenario mode.

    We already create this page.

    I can translate images for english wiki or you have ideas about this page?

    Scenario mode page .

    Example :


    Scenario 9

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.